Statement by Some Victims’ Families of Flight PS752 Regarding:
FACTUAL ANALYSIS report by Canada’s Forensic Team
On June 24, 2021, the Forensic & Examination Assessment Team (Government of Canada) released its report under the title of “Factual Analysis”. This analysis did not add any new information to what we already knew in the two reports released by Ms. Agnes Callamard, UN rapporteur on December 24, 2020 as well as the rulings by the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice on May 20, 2021. However, while the UN report stated that "The inconsistencies in the official explanation and the reckless nature of the mistakes have led many, including myself, to question whether the downing of Flight PS752 was intentional" and the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice stated that: “I find on a balance of probabilities that the missile attacks on Flight 752 were intentional.”, the Forensic Report purposely and with no evidence to proof, have two statements which are as follows: “ the information available to the Forensic Team indicates the IRGC SAM unit operator likely misidentified Flight PS752 as a hostile target” and “The Forensic Team also found no evidence that Iranian officials ordered the shoot-down or that it was premeditated”. In this article, I am going to show that Forensic Report is not an expert written report but a politically motivated report in order to water down the strong statement written in UN report as well as in the rulings of Ontario Supreme Court in order to serve the political goal of the government of Canada rather than searching for justice.
First, we examine the first statemen which is in the section, Surface-to-Air Missile Operator’s Sequence of Events, page 40 of the Forensic Report, which states as the first key fact the following: “the information available to the Forensic Team indicates the IRGC surface-to-air (SAM) unit operator likely misidentified Flight PS752 as a hostile target”. When the body of this section is examined, the Forensic Report relies on the final report released by Islamic Regime and examines the claims in this report and makes the above statement as one of its conclusions. In this section, the Forensic Report failed to state that one possibility can be that Islamic regime has one year to consult the manufacturer of the SAM unit which is the Russian state and had enough time to fabricate a story. Based on the history of lies and denial and non-cooporation by the Islamic regime which is clearly indicated in the rest of the report, this possibility should have been written as such which Forensic report failed to mention. In addition, on page 42, Forensic Report states: “ Iran’s Final Report pointed to actions by the SAM operator as the primary cause of the Flight PS752 shoot-down. It claimed an unanticipated chain of events resulted in the SAM operator firing missiles at Flight PS752. It identified errors related to alignment of the SAM unit, defective communication with the Coordination Center, misidentification of Flight PS752 as a threat, and a failure to follow military procedures by firing at Flight PS752 without approval.”. Then report continues to examine each of the above claims. First the claim for misalignment is examined and this claim is rejected. Then examine the claim for Identification of Flight PS752 as a Hostile Target and this claim is also rejected. Then strangely based on no evidence, the report makes a baseless statement in their key fact that it is likely the operator mistook the airplane with the missile. It looks like the report is written by some expert and some political interference had happened after the report is written which was only able to add their desired statement as key fact without any evidence to support. The report even states on page 47: “The SAM unit arrived at its location west of the capital around midnight TT on January 8, 2020. It was set up and likely operational for over six hours before Flight PS752 was shot down. With nine other flights departing IKA before Flight PS752 on this date, including eight departures after Iran launched missiles into Iraq, there should have been ample opportunity for C2 to detect and correct this misalignment”. This statement clearly contradicts the statement inserted in the key fact.
Now we examine the 2nd statement which stated in the Forensic Report on page 57 as following: “While the Forensic Team found no evidence that the downing of Flight PS752 was premeditated”. This statement has no substantiate evidence to be proved; however, there are other evidence which was ignored by Forensic Report that negate the above statement. In the Forensic report page 47, it states: “With nine other flights departing IKA before Flight PS752 on this date, including eight departures after Iran launched missiles into Iraq”. However, the forensic report failed to list the manufacturing of these 9 departured flights. While on page 28, the Forensic Report as part of the 3 days lies and denial by Islamic regime states: “Ali Abedzadeh, head of Iran’s Civil Aviation Organization, told Iran’s semi-official news agency (Mehr News) that the Flight PS752 pilot had not contacted the airport control tower to alert it of any problems. Abedzadeh also said that Flight PS752’s ”black boxes” – the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder – had been found but that they would not be handed over to Boeing or the Americans”. This is obvious that Islamic regime was mentioning US and Boeing and blaming the technical errors as the cause of the crash during 3 days of lying. At that time Boeing had 2 previous crashes on the news based on technical problems and the Islamic regime was using those to conceal its crime. Why Forensic Report failed to examine this important issue of finding the manufacturers of those 9 airlines and their relation to potential selection as target by Islamic regime? Shouldn’t Forensic Report be curious that there might be a connection between technical error propaganda and the PS752 flight selection as target? Now that Forensic report failed to do so, let us examine that. Out of 9 airlines which flew before flight PS752, 8 of them manufactured by non Boeing manufacturer mainly Airbus. Only one was manufactured by Boeing plus the flight PS752. The one flew before PS752 belonged to Qatar airline going to Hongkong which had approximately 320 passengers and the 2nd one was PS752 with 167 passengers. Since all the fabricated lies and denials by Islamic regime was over the manufacturer failure of Boeing airplane and since Boeing belongs to US and the war was between Iran and US, why Forensic Report failed to examine these facts? Was it an accident that Islamic regime selected one of the two Boeing manufactured airplanes and shot that down and then blamed mechanical failure for three days based on big news of Boeing mechanical failures or was it intentional? Why Forensic Report failed to examine this and instead with no reason and no evidence made such a blunt statement that: “While the Forensic Team found no evidence that the downing of Flight PS752 was premeditated”? In the UN report on December 24, 2020, all airlines flight before PS752 are listed with their manufacturers in appendix E. Are the Canadian team of Forensic expert are less competent than the UN reporters or there was any other issue? Is there any political interference that force the Forensic team with no evidence to make such a blunt statement which negates the rulings of Ontario Supreme Court of Justice or it was just an accident? Why the listing of the manufacturer of the airlines departing before PS752 and if there is any relation between the 3 days of lies by Islamic regime and this targeting was not examined by Forensic Report?
In conclusion, we think the purpose of the report issued by the Forensic team was to water down the ruling by Ontario Supreme Court and it is used for the benefit of political message the Canadian government wants to send to Islamic regime that life of Canadians are for sale. Let’s talk about the price.